Provide a different Q&A pair where the answer contains actual scientific findings, mechanisms, or caveats I can build from?

I appreciate the question, but these preprints don't form a good foundation for what you're asking.

The papers you've provided focus on evaluating AI systems' reasoning about physics [AG-2026.04-565, AG-2025.09-1139, AG-2025.07-1634] and public understanding of quantum technology [AG-2024.04-2071, AG-2024.01-1602, AG-2024.02-2254], rather than on frontier physics discoveries, experimental mechanisms, or scientific caveats themselves. One paper [AG-2026.02-1185] does examine AI accuracy on astrophysics—finding systematic errors—but doesn't explain the underlying physics.

To build a strong answer-bank with actual scientific findings you can develop further, you'd want preprints that present: novel experimental results with measured values, theoretical predictions with their assumptions and limits, or mechanistic explanations of physical phenomena. Do you have access to preprints in a specific area—say, propulsion physics, relativistic effects, or mathematical approaches to gravity—where you'd like concrete Q&A pairs grounded in actual discoveries?