Does clustering remain effective if the true signal isn't actually correlated across those measured dimensions?

Your question hits on a fundamental issue in clustering: can the algorithm find meaningful groups if the underlying data structure doesn't actually have correlated structure along the measured dimensions?

The provided preprints focus on *algorithmic efficiency and implementation* (quantum speedups, sampling tricks, coreset compression) rather than the statistical question of when clustering remains valid in the absence of true signal. None of them directly address cluster validity when correlations are absent.

That said, one paper hints at the broader problem. The k-means++ seeding approach [AG-2024.05-2294] provides an $O(\log k)$ approximation guarantee, but this assumes the data admits meaningful clusters at some scale. Similarly, density-split clustering [AG-2025.01-239] relies on the premise that density variations in the data carry information; if your signal is genuinely uncorrelated noise, density structure becomes spurious.

The honest answer: clustering will *still run* and produce output (the algorithms don't know the difference), but you risk overfitting to noise—finding patterns that have no real meaning. Classical statistics addresses this via metrics like silhouette coefficients or gap statistics, which measure whether clusters are tighter than you'd expect from random data. The preprints here don't explore when these validity checks fail.