Why do these theoretical models assume gravity can be repulsive under any conditions?

Your question cuts to the heart of what these papers are really asking—and the answer hinges on *context*. None of them claim gravity is repulsive "under any conditions." Rather, each describes a narrow, specific regime where repulsion can emerge.

Quantum gravity at the Planck scale

The most straightforward case: [AG-2024.12-507] shows that quantum corrections to Einstein's equations—modeled using the ZLMY type I effective quantum black hole—can flip gravity's sign near the Planck scale (roughly 10⁻³⁵ m). The intuition is that at such extreme densities, quantum fluctuations in spacetime itself become significant and can compete with classical attraction. This doesn't mean gravity is repulsive everywhere; it's a prediction of what happens in a regime we've never directly probed.

Classical velocity-dependent effects

In classical general relativity itself, [AG-2024.02-457] identifies a subtle point: when a test particle moves relative to a mass (like an expanding ball of dust), there's a velocity-dependent term in its acceleration. Depending on the direction and speed, this term *can* be repulsive—even though the mass itself is positive and ordinary. Think of it as a relativistic drag effect. This is mathematically allowed by Einstein's equations, not a violation of them.

Quantum measurement and "weak values"

The most counterintuitive papers ([AG-2026.02-534] and [AG-2026.02-268]) describe a quantum trick. If you prepare a source mass in a spatial superposition, let it interact with a probe mass, and then *postselect* (measure the source in a particular outcome), the probe can appear to have been repelled. This is not a real force in the classical sense—it's a consequence of quantum interference and negative weak values, a quirk of how superposed states interact. The authors argue this reveals that spacetime itself is quantum.

Why these models *don't* assume universal repulsion

The key paper undermining universal repulsion is [AG-2024.07-629], which shows that negative-mass objects—if they existed—would be dynamically unstable in classical general relativity. Gravity's attractiveness is, in a sense, *enforced* by stability.

Additionally, [AG-2025.04-1363] carefully notes that the ALPHA collaboration's landmark 2023 experiment proved antihydrogen (a composite particle) falls toward Earth, ruling out repulsive gravity at 1*g* for ordinary antimatter. The authors propose repulsion only for valence (free) antiquarks in certain theoretical frameworks—a much narrower claim.

The pattern: these models invoke repulsion in exotic regimes (quantum scales, velocity-dependent corrections, measurement-conditioned quantum superpositions, or speculative antimatter sectors) precisely *because* gravity is attractively robust in everyday conditions. None assume it flips universally.