Could this pairing mechanism explain why we don't observe isolated negative masses anywhere in the cosmos?

Your question asks whether a pairing mechanism could explain the cosmic absence of isolated negative masses. The most directly relevant answer comes from the Bondi universe model.

The Pairing Instability

Yes — mixed positive and negative mass configurations are *fundamentally unstable* [AG-2026.01-618]. A linear response analysis of the Vlasov-Poisson system (the equations governing collisionless, self-gravitating matter) reveals that any configuration mixing the two mass types grows unstable at all wavelengths, with shorter-wavelength perturbations growing fastest [AG-2026.01-618]. This is not a gentle effect: the instability drives the system toward a strongly coupled state.

How Pairing Solves It

The remarkable prediction is that the universe *naturally evolves* toward stable positive/negative mass pairs as a consequence of this instability [AG-2026.01-618]. In cosmological N-body simulations, the system passes through three phases: initially ballistic expansion, then random-walk acceleration (from sporadic collisions between isolated masses), and finally uniform acceleration once stable bound pairs form. Once paired, a positive and negative mass orbit each other in a bound state — neither can escape into the cosmos as an isolated particle [AG-2026.02-280].

Why This Matters

This provides a mechanism that doesn't rely on quantum mechanics or exotic energy conditions: classical general relativity itself makes isolated negative masses unstable [AG-2024.07-629]. The pairing scenario suggests they're not forbidden by fundamental law, but rather *dynamically suppressed* by the gravitational instability of any mixed configuration. In other words, negative masses might exist in nature — just never alone.

The Caveat

The preprints don't directly address observational signatures of such paired systems, so it remains unclear how we'd detect them or whether they actually dominate cosmological dynamics.