Could attackers exploit the migration window by targeting wallets still using old cryptography while new systems roll out?

Your question is about cryptographic security during transition periods, not frontier physics. However, the archive does address the related concern of migration vulnerabilities in the context of post-quantum cryptography adoption.

Yes, migration windows create real attack opportunities [AG-2024.02-1291][AG-2024.05-2225]. The problem is that blockchains and other systems cannot flip a switch instantly from old (RSA, elliptic curve) to new (lattice-based) cryptography. During the overlap period, an attacker can target wallets and systems still using classical public-key schemes while others migrate forward [AG-2024.01-1401].

This is especially acute in blockchain because of "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks: an adversary can record encrypted transactions today using old cryptography, then—once quantum computers arrive powerful enough to run Shor's algorithm—retroactively break the encryption and steal funds [AG-2024.02-1291]. The same hazard applies to any long-lived sensitive data.

The concrete risk is highest for systems with legacy constraints. Industrial and critical infrastructure often use low-power hardware that cannot easily adopt post-quantum algorithms (like Kyber or Dilithium), creating extended transition periods where obsolete and new cryptography must coexist [AG-2024.01-1401]. An attacker aware of this patchwork can selectively target the weakest nodes.

Why it matters: This is why cryptographers and governments are pushing *now* for standardization and early adoption of post-quantum schemes—the longer the migration, the longer the window stays open [AG-2024.05-2225].