How does screening breakdown distance compare between the Sun and a neutron star in the same theory?

# Screening Breakdown Distance: Sun vs. Neutron Star

Your question asks about a specific technical comparison—how the characteristic distance scale at which screening breaks down differs between the Sun and a neutron star. This is important because screening mechanisms (like the symmetron or dilaton) suppress modifications to gravity in dense environments, but that suppression weakens with distance from the source.

Unfortunately, the provided preprints don't directly compare screening breakdown distances for the same theory across these two object types.

What we do have:

The symmetron and dilaton screening mechanisms have been studied in white dwarfs [AG-2025.05-519], where both fields enhance pressure drop in low-density stars and their effects are suppressed in more massive ones. We also know that neutron stars serve as powerful probes for testing gravity [AG-2024.07-495] and that screening effects become important when testing modified gravity theories at different scales [AG-2026.02-139]. However, none of these works present the side-by-side calculation you're asking for.

To answer your question properly, you'd need a paper that solves the scalar-tensor equilibrium equations for both a solar-mass star and a neutron star within the same theoretical framework, then extracts the screening radius (the distance at which the scalar field "turns on") for each. The jump from solar to neutron-star density would be dramatic—roughly five orders of magnitude—so the screening breakdown distance would shrink accordingly, but the exact scaling depends on the specific theory and coupling strength.