What decay distances maximize detector acceptance for long-lived particles in a given dump-to-detector geometry?

# Decay Distance Optimization for Long-Lived Particle Detection

The question of optimal decay distances touches on a fundamental trade-off in long-lived particle (LLP) searches: you want particles to decay *after* they've traveled far enough to escape backgrounds near the beam dump, but *before* they escape your detector's sensitive volume.

The Competing Constraints

The archive doesn't contain a dedicated theoretical treatment of this optimization problem, but several experiments illustrate the practical considerations. The key insight is that acceptance depends on the overlap between where particles decay and where your detector is positioned [AG-2025.01-1235].

In beam-dump geometries, particles are produced with a strong forward boost. If they decay too soon (near the dump), their decay products may be buried in the beam-dump shielding or lost to the intense radiation environment. If they decay too late, they escape downstream before reaching the detector. The "sweet spot" is a decay length that allows:

1. Sufficient shielding from the production point — decay far enough to avoid backgrounds from prompt interactions at the dump [AG-2024.01-1042]

2. Arrival in the detector volume — the detector geometry determines the maximum useful decay distance [AG-2025.07-1520]

Practical Examples

At the LUXE-NPOD facility, optimization involved a "systematic study of the new physics reach in the full, realistic experimental apparatus, including an existing detector," showing that careful geometry design confirms background-free operation [AG-2025.07-1520]. Similarly, at spallation sources using neutrino detectors positioned downstream, sensitivity to light particles depends critically on where those particles decay in flight relative to the detector's sensitive volume [AG-2025.09-1412].

The DUNE-PRISM concept adds a refinement: moving the detector off-axis changes the effective decay-distance window and improves discrimination between different LLP production mechanisms [AG-2025.12-1705].

Why This Matters

Optimizing decay distance is essentially a geometry puzzle: given your beam energy (which sets the Lorentz boost), detector size, and shielding configuration, there exists a characteristic decay length that maximizes signal acceptance while rejecting background. This can't be solved analytically without specifying the particular experimental layout.

The provided preprints focus on specific facilities and benchmarks rather than a general formula; a dedicated study of decay-length optimization as an abstract problem would strengthen this answer.