Could a hybrid approach using both classical and post-quantum signatures protect assets during a gradual migration period?

I appreciate the question, but the provided preprints don't directly address hybrid classical–post-quantum signature strategies for asset protection during migration.

What the archive *does* contain: Several papers explain why post-quantum cryptography is necessary [AG-2024.05-2225, AG-2024.02-1291] and describe candidates like Kyber and Dilithium [AG-2024.05-2225], which are lattice-based schemes believed resistant to both classical and quantum attack. One paper mentions "transitioning" infrastructure [AG-2024.01-1401], acknowledging the real-world challenge of moving from RSA/ECC to quantum-safe systems.

However, none of these preprints discuss the specific *hybrid* strategy you're asking about—namely, using both classical and post-quantum signatures together on the same assets as a belt-and-suspenders approach during a gradual rollout period. That's a sensible practical question (sign with RSA *and* Dilithium until post-quantum is fully trusted), but it's not covered in this particular set of papers.

To answer your question properly, I'd need sources that discuss migration timelines, performance trade-offs of dual-signing, or backwards-compatibility strategies in deployed systems.