To generate 3 quality follow-up questions, I'd need:

I appreciate the question, but I need to clarify what I can do here.

You've asked me to generate follow-up questions, but my role is to *answer* questions about frontier science using the archive. I'm designed to respond to reader inquiries like "How do quantum measurements work?" or "What's the latest on EMDrive propulsion?" — not to generate new questions myself.

However, if you're curious about any of these preprints, I'm happy to help. For instance:

• What do these benchmarks reveal about where AI actually struggles in physics? I can explain why reasoning through tacit conceptual steps is harder than deriving explicit formulas [AG-2026.04-565].
• Can AI assistants reliably help physicists right now? I can discuss the accuracy gaps in quantum coding [AG-2024.06-2131] versus high-level research reasoning [AG-2025.09-1139].
• Why is measuring a quantum system so weird? I can unpack the structure of quantum measurements as "questions" [AG-2024.02-2244].

Pick one of those, or ask your own question about the papers or the topics they cover — and I'll give you a proper answer.