Could quantum algorithms achieve exponential speedup over quicksort for certain sorting problems?

The preprints provided don't directly address sorting algorithms on quantum computers. The archive covers quantum speedups for *search* problems (like Grover's algorithm [AG-2024.03-1959]), *hidden subgroup* problems [AG-2024.01-1623], and combinatorial optimization [AG-2024.06-1717], but sorting is a different computational task entirely.

That said, I can sketch the general picture: sorting is what complexity theorists call a "comparison-based" problem, and there's a fundamental lower bound—you need at least Ω(*n* log *n*) comparisons classically. Quantum computers, even with all their tricks, face similar lower bounds for comparison-based sorting because the problem structure doesn't naturally admit the kind of amplitude amplification or phase kickback that makes Grover's algorithm [AG-2024.03-1959] powerful. Quicksort achieves the classical best-case O(*n* log *n*) on average, which is already near-optimal.

The quantum speedups documented in this archive—exponential for searching, polynomial for some optimization tasks—don't transfer to general sorting. You'd need a specialized sorting problem with extra structure (like sorting *pre-sorted* data, or sorting with special quantum oracle access) to gain advantage, and that's not what the archive explores.

None of the preprints directly compare quantum sorting to quicksort.