Why might ray tracing work for black hole visualization but fail for higher-dimensional quantum systems?

Ray tracing works beautifully for black holes because light rays follow well-defined paths—geodesics—through curved spacetime, and those paths are *local* and *deterministic*: given a starting point and direction, a photon's trajectory is completely determined [AG-2025.11-257, AG-2024.08-463]. You can literally trace photons backward from an observer's eye to their source, or forward from an emitter to the image plane. The method succeeded in simulating the photon ring around M87* precisely because General Relativity gives you a clean equation of motion for massless particles [AG-2024.06-309].

Higher-dimensional quantum systems fail ray tracing for a fundamental reason: quantum particles don't have definite trajectories. In quantum mechanics, a particle exists in a superposition of many paths simultaneously until measured. There's no single "ray" to trace. More concretely, when you embed quantum systems in higher-dimensional or exotic geometries—like fractal lattices or curved synthetic spaces in quantum simulators [AG-2024.07-155]—the behavior becomes dominated by interference, topology, and entanglement rather than classical light paths. A ray tracer would miss all of that.

The deeper contrast: black hole ray tracing treats light classically (or semi-classically), exploiting a regime where quantum effects are negligible and geometry is the only player. Quantum systems require you to track amplitudes and phases through all possible paths (think Feynman path integrals), not just the classical extremum. The higher the dimension, the more exotic the entangled state structure becomes—visualizing such a system still requires creative tools like immersive VR to inspect AI-generated proposals [AG-2024.02-1875], but not ray tracing in any traditional sense.

None of these preprints directly address why ray tracing fails for quantum systems; they illustrate the methods' success in gravity and hint at the difficulty of visualizing quantum complexity, but don't discuss the conceptual incompatibility head-on.