Why do most games simplify collision detection instead of using true physics simulation?

I appreciate the question, but this archive covers frontier science—physics, mathematics, and propulsion. Your question is about video game design and computational graphics, which sits outside this collection.

That said, I can briefly note why it's relevant: the preprints here touch on *why* full physics simulation is hard. The three-body problem [AG-2025.10-964] illustrates that even three gravitating objects have no closed-form solution—only approximate or numerical methods work. Game developers face the same challenge: exact collision detection between many objects requires solving coupled equations that grow exponentially harder as object count increases. They use approximations (spatial hashing, bounding boxes, simplified shapes) the way astrophysicists use particle-mesh methods [AG-2025.12-078]—trading accuracy for speed. But this archive doesn't contain game engine research, so I can't give you citations specific to your question.