Why does beam-dump geometry optimization vary between different exotic particle types?

Your question is about *beam-dump geometry optimization*, but the preprints you've been given mostly address nuclear collision geometry and heavy-ion physics—not the exotic-particle searches where beam-dump design actually varies by particle type.

That said, the two preprints most relevant do point at the real answer:

Different particles have different production angular distributions, which drives geometry choices [AG-2026.01-1312]. When you're hunting for a new particle—say, an axion-like particle (ALP) versus a heavy neutral lepton (HNL)—they're typically produced by different mechanisms. An ALP might be radiated coherently off a photon beam in a narrow cone, while an HNL might be produced by rare neutrino interactions distributed more broadly in angle. A dump geometry optimized to catch one won't efficiently catch the other [AG-2024.01-1042].

For concrete examples: in the LUXE-NPOD setup, the optical dump geometry was tuned specifically for light spin-0 particles (scalar bosons) interacting with photons in a particular energy range [AG-2025.07-1520]. By contrast, the NA62 beam-dump concept can be reconfigured for different new-physics scenarios by adjusting detector placement, because "different production mechanisms can generate different angular distributions" [AG-2026.01-1312].

The deeper constraint is the "beam-dump ceiling"—a fundamental limit on sensitivity that's insensitive to detector geometry alone [AG-2024.01-1042]—but geometry still matters for maximizing signal acceptance *before* you hit that ceiling.

The archive doesn't contain papers systematically comparing geometry optimization *across* different exotic particle types in detail; this answer reflects what's implicitly there.