Why might sensor spacing patterns create different types of extrapolation errors than uniform dimensional scaling?

This is a genuinely interesting question about measurement error that sits at the intersection of sampling theory and physical inference — but the archive provided doesn't directly address it.

Here's why: your question is about how the *geometry* of where you place sensors affects interpolation and extrapolation errors differently than simple uniform rescaling would predict. That's a problem in experimental design and signal reconstruction.

The preprints here tackle related but distinct issues:

• Sparsity covariance [AG-2025.02-311] addresses how random, discrete sampling of observations (like galaxies scattered across the sky) introduces uncertainties that depend on sample geometry rather than noise alone — this is conceptually close, but focuses on how sparse coverage affects correlation function estimates in a continuous underlying field, not how systematic spacing patterns change extrapolation bias.

• Unequal time field projection [AG-2025.02-169] shows that treating observations as if they occur at a single reference time, when they actually don't, introduces first- and second-order errors depending on how you bin them — again touching sensor/observation placement, but in the time domain and in a specific cosmological context.

• The discrete spacetime and scaling papers [AG-2024.01-482, AG-2024.09-480, AG-2025.06-629] explore how discreteness at the Planck scale affects distance measurement and scaling, but they're about fundamental physics, not sensor array design.

None of these directly compare how, say, logarithmic vs. linear vs. clustered sensor spacing produces qualitatively different extrapolation error modes. The archive would need papers on experimental design, inverse problems, or signal processing under spatial sampling constraints to really answer this.