If quantum superposition creates repulsive gravity, would it only work on microscopic objects?

Your question frames an interesting logical puzzle: *if* quantum superposition creates repulsive gravity, *must* it only affect tiny objects?

The short answer is no — but the mechanism is so exotic that scale becomes almost irrelevant.

The postselection trick

The repulsive gravity effect in these papers doesn't arise from superposition itself, but from a very particular measurement outcome. When a source mass sits in a quantum superposition of two locations, and you *postselect* on finding it in one specific state, the probe mass appears to have been pushed away [AG-2026.02-534]. This is a bit like saying: "Given that the coin landed heads, what does that tell us about the trajectory of the ball?" — the postselection retroactively conditions the force.

This effect relies on quantum interference between gravitational fields from different parts of the superposition [AG-2026.02-268]. Crucially, it doesn't depend on the superposed object being microscopically small. A macroscopic object in superposition would in principle generate the same interference pattern.

Why microscopic, then?

The catch is *feasibility*, not physics. Preparing a macroscopic object — say, a coin — in a genuine spatial superposition is fiendishly difficult. Decoherence (unwanted interaction with the environment) kills superpositions almost instantly as objects get larger. The experimental proposals use nanocrystals [AG-2026.02-534] and micron-sized diamonds with embedded quantum spins [AG-2025.09-021] because these are the largest things we can currently keep in superposition long enough to test the effect.

So the limitation isn't that repulsive gravity only works on tiny objects — it's that we can only *demonstrate* it with tiny objects given current technology.

---

The provided preprints don't discuss whether quantum-superposition-induced repulsion would scale differently (e.g., nonlinearly) with object size; that question remains open.