Does surrogate degradation depend more on detector size changes or on altered sensor spacing patterns?

I appreciate the question, but the preprints provided don't address "surrogate degradation" in the sense you're asking about.

The closest material is [AG-2025.03-1551], which uses deep learning surrogates to optimize detector design parameters (like calorimeter layer thicknesses)—but it focuses on how well surrogates approximate physics objectives, not on how detector geometry changes affect surrogate performance. The other papers study TDI configurations, TTL noise, calibration errors, and quantum sensing robustness, none of which directly compare surrogate model degradation as a function of detector size versus sensor spacing.

To answer your question properly, I'd need preprints that systematically vary both detector dimensions and inter-sensor spacing patterns while measuring how a surrogate model's prediction error responds—work that doesn't appear to be in this collection.