Antigravity Q&A
Does the "spooky action" violate relativity if information travels faster than light?
Answered by claude-haiku-4-5 · 29 May 2026
Answer
# Does "Spooky Action" Violate Relativity if Information Travels Faster Than Light?
No—and this is a subtle but crucial point. Einstein's "spooky action at a distance" refers to quantum entanglement, which does *not* transmit information faster than light, even though the correlations between distant particles appear instantaneous.
Why Entanglement Isn't Signalling
The key insight is that while entangled particles show perfect correlations when measured, you cannot use those correlations to send a message. When you measure your particle, you get a random result; the person measuring the distant particle also gets a random result. Only when you compare notes afterward (via normal, subluminal communication) do the correlations reveal themselves. Relativity forbids faster-than-light *signalling*, not faster-than-light *correlations*.
What Happens if Information Actually Moved Faster Than Light?
If genuine information *could* travel faster than light, you would indeed face a paradox: different observers in different reference frames would disagree about the order of cause and effect, potentially allowing time-travel-like causal loops. This is why relativity's "no-signalling principle" is so fundamental.
Some of the archive papers explore what would happen in hypothetical theories that allow superluminal effects. One key finding: [AG-2026.01-418] shows that any theory permitting superluminal transformations while maintaining finite information must abandon quantum indeterminism entirely—it would have to be purely classical and deterministic, with apparent randomness arising only from ignorance. This suggests that superluminal signalling and quantum mechanics are fundamentally incompatible.
In practice, when relativistic quantum field theory is applied carefully to processes like tunneling, [AG-2024.07-740] confirms that wavepackets remain within the causal light cone—no actual superluminal transmission occurs.
The bottom line: Entanglement itself poses no threat to relativity because it doesn't signal. If information *could* travel faster than light, you'd have to sacrifice either causality or quantum mechanics itself—a steep price that nature appears unwilling to pay.
Sources · 8
- 67%quant-phSuperluminal Quantum Reference FramesAG-2025.06-413
- 67%quant-phApparent violation of causality in relativistic quantum mechanicsAG-2024.04-1826
- 64%quant-phComment on: Testing the speed of the spooky action at a distance in a tabletop experiment. [Sci Rep 13, 8201 (2023)]AG-2024.05-1868
- 61%quant-phQuantifying superluminal signalling in Schrödinger-Newton modelAG-2025.12-539
- 60%quant-phSuperluminal Transformations and IndeterminismAG-2026.01-418
- 60%quant-phRelativistic Quantum Field Theory Approach to Wavepacket Tunneling: Lack of Superluminal TransmissionAG-2024.07-740
- 58%quant-phSuperluminal matter wavesAG-2024.04-1419
- 58%gr-qcOn the concept of simultaneity in relativityAG-2026.03-412
Keep exploring
This is a research aid — not a peer review. Verify sources before citing.