What length scale mismatch specifically prevents DFTB MBD from capturing mode I-to-mode II crack transitions?

I appreciate the specificity of your question, but the provided preprints don't directly address mode I-to-mode II crack transitions or the length scale mismatch that prevents DFTB+MBD from capturing them.

The archive does contain a detailed DFTB+MBD framework paper [AG-2024.04-1576] that describes the strengths and limitations of combining quantum tight-binding with many-body dispersion, but its abstract doesn't itemize length scale mismatches in fracture mechanics—it focuses on van der Waals interactions and materials applications more broadly. A preprint specifically comparing crack-tip fields across modes and analyzing where the MBD description breaks down would directly answer your question.