Could precision measurements of τ→μγ at future muon colliders eventually surpass quark FCNC sensitivity?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

This is a fascinating question at the intersection of lepton and quark physics. The short answer is: the preprints don't directly compare τ→μγ sensitivity to quark FCNC, but they do show that tau dipole measurements at future colliders will reach extraordinary precision—potentially rivaling or exceeding quark FCNC reach in some regimes.

Here's what we know from the archive:

Tau dipole moment sensitivity at future colliders

Future muon and lepton colliders can probe the tau anomalous magnetic moment (a_τ, related to τ→μγ via loop processes) to levels of 10^−5 to 10^−4 [AG-2024.10-1276, AG-2026.04-1198]. This represents a 10,000-fold improvement over current experimental bounds [AG-2024.10-1276]. The mechanisms include Drell-Yan tau-pair production, vector-boson fusion, and associated Higgs production—all of which can constrain the effective dipole couplings that enter τ→μγ at loop level.

Top quark FCNC sensitivity

By contrast, a 10 TeV muon collider can reach sensitivities to top-quark FCNC couplings (like t→qZ and t→qγ) at the 10^−3 level in coupling strength, corresponding to branching ratios of 10^−6 [AG-2026.04-1184]. The FCC-μp can probe t→qγ down to branching ratios of order 10^−5 [AG-2024.10-1425].

The comparison

On branching-ratio scales, quark FCNC reach (10^−6) appears superior to lepton dipole reach (10^−5–10^−4). *However*, this comparison is subtle because:

1. Effective coupling strength vs. branching ratio: The tau dipole measurements directly constrain the Wilson coefficients of the dipole operators, whereas top FCNC branching ratios depend on additional factors (phase space, competing decay modes).

2. Different new-physics windows: τ→μγ probes flavor violation in the lepton sector and is sensitive to models with leptoquarks, extra Higgs bosons, or compositeness in leptons. Top FCNC is sensitive to a partly overlapping but distinct class of beyond-Standard-Model scenarios.

The preprints provided don't address a direct head-to-head comparison of τ→μγ versus quark FCNC discovery potential at the same future facility.