Can collider b-jet counting distinguish flavor violation from standard model backgrounds without additional kinematic cuts?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

B Jet Counting and Flavor Violation: A Clever Asymmetry Yes — but with a crucial caveat that the preprints illuminate. The key insight comes from exploiting an approximate symmetry of the Standard Model. In ordinary SM processes like single and di jet production via charged currents at an electron proton collider, producing an odd number of b jets is extremely suppressed because it requires CKM forbidden quark flavor transitions [AG 2026.01 1077]. By contrast, new physics involving flavor violation can naturally produce odd numbers of b jets. This creates a stark asymmetry: simply counting b jets in the final state provides a direct probe , since SM backgrounds for the "odd b jet" category are negligible [AG 2026.01 1077]. This matters because it sidesteps the usual problem: traditional approaches rely on assigning subjective quality thresholds (working points) to b tagging scores, accumulating systematic uncertainties. Here, the background suppression is theoretical, not statistical. However , the "without additional cuts" qualifier needs nuance. The method assumes you can reliably identify and count b jets in the first place. That's non trivial. Recent work shows that flavored jet algorithms vary significantly in performance depending on the kinematic regime [AG 2025.06 1349], and even state of the art machine learning taggers must contend with infrared and collinear safety issues [AG 2025.06 1349]. Additionally, in complex multi b jet topologies (like vectorlike quark decays), distinguishing signal from background still requires careful event selection [AG 2024.09 1216]. So the honest answer: b jet counting exploits a real SM symmetry that suppresses backgrounds theoretically, but you cannot escape needing good b tagging performance — which itself depends on kinematic cuts and algorithm choice. The provided preprints don't directly compare flavor violation counting to other Standard Model background rejection methods in a single study.