Could a single modified gravity theory bridge both galactic and cosmological acceleration regimes?

# Can a Single Modified Gravity Theory Bridge Galactic and Cosmological Scales?

This is precisely the core tension that modern modified gravity research confronts. The honest answer from these papers is: it's difficult, but some promising frameworks exist.

The Core Challenge

General Relativity needs dark energy to explain cosmic acceleration and dark matter for galactic dynamics — two separate additions. Modified gravity theorists ask: can one theory explain *both* without these ad hoc components? [AG-2025.11-174] directly addresses this and identifies the central obstacle: theories that reproduce cosmic acceleration often fail Solar System tests — they predict deviations in light-bending and other precision measurements that we can actually observe.

This is the "bridging problem." Cosmological acceleration and galactic/Solar System dynamics operate at radically different scales, and modifying gravity to work at one scale easily breaks it at the other.

Frameworks That Attempt the Bridge

A few approaches show promise:

Fractional Newtonian gravity comes closest to a unified description [AG-2026.03-379]. Using a minimal modification with a single tuning parameter, this framework reproduces the full cosmic history (inflation, matter/radiation eras, late acceleration) *and* correctly predicts Mercury's perihelion precession and light deflection near the Sun — all within the same observational constraints. This suggests a unified phenomenology might be possible, though it remains a "phenomenological description" rather than a fundamental theory.

Variable gravitational coupling offers another route [AG-2026.02-411], [AG-2024.09-028]. If the gravitational constant $G$ and fundamental particle masses evolve in time, cosmic acceleration emerges naturally without a cosmological constant. This directly links dark energy to precision tests of fundamental constants — a testable connection between cosmology and particle physics labs.

Geometric approaches from higher-dimensional physics show potential [AG-2025.05-106]. An M-theory-inspired model with evolving geometric moduli generates an effective cosmological term that claims consistency "across both cosmological and astrophysical scales," though the concrete astrophysical predictions (e.g., modified black hole quasi-normal modes) remain to be fully tested.

The Verdict

No single theory has yet cleanly unified both regimes without either fine-tuning or predictions that strain against observations [AG-2025.11-174]. But the fractional Newtonian framework [AG-2026.03-379] and variable-coupling models suggest the answer might be *yes in principle* — with a single underlying principle expressing itself differently across scales, much as electromagnetism and weak forces unify at high energy but look distinct at low energy.

The key unsolved problem is whether any such unification can survive the mounting precision tests of gravity across a decade of scales simultaneously.