Would quirk pairs always separate back-to-back, or could detector geometry bias which angles we'd actually observe?

Your question touches on detector bias in measuring particle correlations, but there's a conceptual mismatch here worth clarifying.

The papers in this batch don't address quark-pair separation angles directly. Instead, they examine what happens *after* quarks fragment into observable hadrons—and yes, detector geometry absolutely matters for what we actually measure.

Here's the key insight: when a quark pair is produced back-to-back in the center of mass frame, conservation of momentum is built into the physics. But what we *observe* depends entirely on detector acceptance [AG-2025.01-1106, AG-2025.09-1490].

The clearest example comes from azimuthal-angle measurements in dihadron pairs. These studies use the fact that if you measure two particles' angles (φ₁ and φ₂), the difference φ₁ − φ₂ encodes the spin correlations between the original quarks [AG-2025.01-1106]. But you can only measure this if *both* hadrons fall within your detector's fiducial region. If one leg points into a dead zone or cracks between detector elements, you miss that event entirely—introducing a collider bias that preferentially selects certain angular regions [AG-2024.04-2060].

For gravitational-wave detectors, the geometric effect is even more dramatic: detector shape (triangular vs. L-shaped) and orientation dramatically change sensitivity to directional signals [AG-2025.11-484]. A parity-violating gravitational-wave background doesn't radiate uniformly in all directions, so the network's geometry acts as a spatial filter.

The papers don't directly model how quark-pair angle distributions are distorted by detector acceptance.