If quantum computers break current keys, could attackers drain player wallets before the migration finishes?

Your question touches on a real concern, but it's actually about *cryptocurrency security* rather than frontier physics—and the preprints provided are about quantum computing fundamentals and cryptanalysis, not wallet theft timelines.

That said, the archive does address the underlying threat:

The quantum threat to current cryptography is real but not imminent. Shor's algorithm can break RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (which secure most blockchain private keys) [AG-2024.05-2225], but executing it requires a quantum computer with far more qubits and much lower error rates than exist today [AG-2024.01-2022]. One assessment concludes that "quantum computers are not believed to currently pose security risks" [AG-2024.01-2022].

The migration window is substantial. Post-quantum cryptography schemes like Kyber and Dilithium are already standardized and ready for deployment [AG-2024.05-2225], and the blockchain research community is actively designing quantum-resistant systems [AG-2024.02-1291]. This gives institutions years to upgrade before a cryptanalytically relevant quantum computer arrives.

A different quantum attack is theoretically faster but less practical. A quantum miner could execute a 51%-style attack on proof-of-work blockchains using Grover's algorithm—but this requires an "extremely fast and fault-tolerant quantum computer" and would "likely be impossible to execute in forthcoming years" [AG-2024.03-1707].

In short: the timeline for wallet drains via key-breaking is measured in years-to-decades, not months, giving the industry time to migrate—but it requires *actually deploying* post-quantum upgrades, which is the real coordination challenge.