Could a video game engine ever simulate quantum superposition, or is Newtonian physics fundamentally incompatible?

# Can a Video Game Engine Simulate Quantum Superposition?

The short answer: not with Newtonian physics alone, but you don't need one. The real question is what you're trying to achieve.

The Core Incompatibility

Newtonian physics is *deterministic*. Given initial conditions, the next state follows inevitably. Quantum superposition is the opposite: a particle genuinely exists in multiple states simultaneously until measured, and the outcome is inherently probabilistic. You cannot encode true superposition in a classical Newtonian engine any more than you can encode a coin spinning in midair by storing just "heads" or "tails."

However, quantum systems *do* obey linear mathematics [AG-2024.03-1636], which means their evolution can be computed. The barrier isn't conceptual; it's computational. A classical computer can *simulate* quantum behavior by tracking probability amplitudes (complex numbers describing each possible state's strength), but this becomes exponentially slower as the system grows—which is exactly why quantum computers are being built.

What Actually Works in Games

The archive shows two practical approaches:

1. Direct quantum circuit simulation. The Qubit Factory [AG-2024.06-1993] embeds an actual quantum circuit simulator into a puzzle game. Players build quantum circuits and see real superposition, entanglement, and measurement outcomes. This isn't faking it: the engine computes genuine quantum states and collapses them when measured. This works because quantum simulators are feasible for small systems (a few dozen qubits), and game designers don't need to simulate the whole universe—just the qubits in play.

2. Metaphorical or artistic representations. The Quantum Photo Booth [AG-2024.02-1886] and the Schrödinger Synthesizer [AG-2024.02-1274] don't compute superposition directly. Instead, they use quantum concepts as design metaphors: players experience measurement, decoherence, and uncertainty through gameplay mechanics and sound synthesis. This teaches intuition without requiring the engine to "truly" superpose objects.

Why This Matters

The distinction matters because a game's physics engine and its *logic* are separate. A game using Newtonian collision detection and gravity can still run quantum computations in the background and display the results—just as a calculator running on classical silicon can compute probabilities from quantum theory. The engine needn't be quantum; only the mathematical model it's executing needs to be.

The provided preprints don't directly address the engineering limits of embedding quantum simulators into commercial game engines, so I can't give you specific benchmarks on what's feasible in Unreal or Unity.