How do quantum boomerang attacks exploit weak S-boxes differently than classical differential cryptanalysis?

This archive doesn't directly address your question. The preprints cover quantum attacks on *symmetric cipher design* (S-boxes, differential cryptanalysis) and post-quantum cryptography standards, but none compare how quantum boomerang attacks exploit S-box structure *differently* than classical differential cryptanalysis—that is, what new vulnerabilities quantum speedup reveals in S-box design itself.

What I *can* tell you from the archive:

Quantum boomerang attacks are a generalization of classical boomerang cryptanalysis adapted to quantum adversaries [AG-2024.07-2243]. The key quantum advantage is that algorithms for finding boomerang distinguishers maintain polynomial complexity while fully accounting for S-box behavior and key scheduling, whereas classical boomerang attacks typically require exponential search or heuristics to navigate this complexity [AG-2024.07-2243].

Similarly, quantum automatic tools for impossible differential attacks can "accurately characterize S-boxes while only requiring polynomial complexity" [AG-2024.07-1997]—a significant speedup because classically, S-box analysis during differential search is computationally expensive.

However, the preprints don't explain the *mechanistic difference*—e.g., whether quantum boomerang attacks exploit non-linearity, diffusion properties, or specific algebraic structures in S-boxes in ways that classical differential cryptanalysis cannot. That deeper comparison isn't in this collection.