If quantum superposition creates repulsive gravity, would it only work on microscopic objects?

This is a clever question, but it rests on a misconception about what the preprints actually propose.

The papers don't claim that quantum superposition *creates* repulsive gravity in general. Rather, they describe a very specific scenario: when you prepare a *source mass* in a quantum superposition of two different locations, and then conditionally measure where that source ends up, the *probe mass* can appear to have been repelled [AG-2026.02-534, AG-2026.02-268]. This repulsion arises from quantum interference between two gravitational configurations — it's a measurement-dependent effect, not a fundamental property of superposition itself.

Crucially, this effect doesn't depend on the size of the objects. What matters is that the superposition be coherent (maintained without collapsing) and that the measurement be carefully chosen. The proposed experimental test uses nanocrystals — genuinely tiny objects — but that's for practical reasons: they're easier to keep in quantum superposition long enough for the measurement [AG-2026.02-534]. In principle, the same logic could apply to larger masses, though maintaining macroscopic quantum coherence becomes exponentially harder as objects get bigger.

There's also a subtler point worth noting: not all theoretical frameworks agree on whether even microscopic superpositions would reliably produce this effect. Different quantum gravity models make different predictions about how entanglement between a mass and spacetime actually works [AG-2024.05-603, AG-2025.10-576].

So to directly answer your question: if this effect is real, it wouldn't be fundamentally limited to microscopic objects by the physics — only by the practical difficulty of maintaining quantum coherence in anything macroscopic.