*If you have an actual science question** (about physics, biology, astronomy, propulsion, etc.), I'd be happy to generate three contextual follow-ups using the rules you specified.

I appreciate the prompt, but I notice you've sent me a meta-question about how I work, rather than a science question for me to answer using the archive.

This archive covers frontier science (propulsion, relativity, mathematical physics, and related topics). If you have a real question about physics, propulsion, or related fields, I'd be delighted to answer it using the preprints provided—or to generate follow-ups if that would help.

For example, you might ask:

• "Can current AI systems actually solve cutting-edge physics problems?"
• "What's the risk that we could accidentally destroy the vacuum?"
• "How do physicists test competing theories objectively?"

What would you like to know?