How does relativistic GPS correction actually affect traffic light synchronization accuracy?

Traffic light synchronization isn't directly addressed in this archive, but the underlying relativistic corrections that affect GPS—and would apply to any synchronized system using satellite time—are well-documented here.

Here's the core issue: GPS satellites orbit at ~14,000 km/h and experience weaker Earth gravity than ground stations, so their clocks run faster by about 38 microseconds per day due to relativity [AG-2025.07-604]. Without accounting for this, position errors compound at roughly 10 km per day. For traffic lights, the practical consequence is that any system relying on GPS time stamps for synchronization across a city would drift noticeably within hours if relativistic corrections were omitted.

The relevant framework is that GPS operates using at least two relativistic effects: time dilation from the satellite's orbital velocity (special relativity) and gravitational redshift from the weaker gravity field at orbital altitude (general relativity) [AG-2025.09-416]. Modern GPS receivers apply both corrections in real time, which is why they achieve meter-level accuracy despite the relativistic effect being so large.

For *traffic light synchronization specifically*, the accuracy needed depends on the application. If lights are coordinated to within a few milliseconds, relativistic GPS errors would be negligible—the local clock-drift in the traffic controller would dominate. But if a city wanted sub-millisecond synchronization across many lights (useful for coordinating sensor data or autonomous vehicles), relativistic effects would become relevant, and you'd need to apply the same transformations between terrestrial time and satellite time that modern GNSS systems already implement [AG-2025.11-336].

None of these preprints directly model traffic light synchronization scenarios.