Why do faster-than-light solutions inevitably create time machines, but slower-than-light ones don't?

This is a subtle question that touches on deep principles of relativity — and the honest answer is that the preprints provided don't directly explain the causal mechanism you're asking about.

That said, I can sketch the physics your question assumes:

In special relativity, causality and the light cone structure are intimately linked. If you can travel faster than light in one reference frame, then by Lorentz transforming to a different inertial frame, that same journey can appear to happen *backwards in time* [AG-2026.04-020]. This isn't a bug; it's a theorem: superluminal transport in one frame becomes time-travel in another frame where the order of events reverses.

Slower-than-light travel dodges this because timelike worldlines (those bounded by the light speed limit) remain timelike under all Lorentz transformations — their temporal order is frame-independent [AG-2026.04-020]. You can never find a frame where a slower-than-light journey runs backward.

One paper touches the tension directly: when certain quantum field theories allow superluminal signal propagation on some backgrounds, closed timelike curves (time machines) can spontaneously form from ordinary initial conditions [AG-2024.06-694]. The paper argues quantum effects may resolve this paradox, but the classical picture is clear — superluminality and causality violation are two faces of the same relativistic coin.

The warp drive represents a potential escape hatch: by warping spacetime itself rather than moving through spacetime faster than light locally, one might bypass the causality argument [AG-2025.08-561] — though whether such solutions actually avoid closed timelike curves remains disputed.

None of these preprints directly prove why FTL *inevitably* creates time machines; they illustrate the phenomenon rather than derive it from first principles.