Why do thermal corrections vanish at high accelerations instead of remaining present in General Relativity?

Your question touches on a subtle but important distinction between different notions of "thermality" in accelerated systems — and the preprints here suggest the answer is more nuanced than "they vanish."

Thermal Effects Don't Vanish; They Reshape

The key insight is that acceleration doesn't eliminate thermal signatures from General Relativity—it *changes their character*.

An accelerating observer experiences the Unruh effect: the quantum vacuum appears thermally populated at a temperature proportional to proper acceleration [AG-2025.09-037]. This effect is fundamental and doesn't disappear at high acceleration; instead, the thermal bath temperature grows. However, what *does* change is how different parts of an accelerated system couple to this bath.

The Decoupling at High Acceleration

Recent work shows that at very high accelerations, certain thermal corrections become *dynamically irrelevant* to the system's evolution, even though the underlying thermal bath remains. For example, [AG-2025.09-037] demonstrates a striking asymmetry: while an accelerated atom's *internal energy levels* can thermalize to the Unruh bath via emission and absorption, the atom's center-of-mass motion does not achieve thermal equilibrium with that same bath. The fluctuation-dissipation theorem—which normally guarantees detailed balance—breaks down for the translational degree of freedom.

In other contexts, [AG-2026.01-348] shows that classical zero-point radiation alone does *not* thermalize a system merely because it accelerates, despite superficial similarities between acceleration and temperature. This suggests thermal effects require specific coupling mechanisms that don't universally activate.

Why This Matters

High accelerations can effectively decouple certain physical degrees of freedom from thermal baths they would otherwise interact with—not because General Relativity changes, but because the coupling strength or timescale for thermalization may diverge or vanish relative to the dynamical timescale. It's similar to how a fast-moving particle can "freeze out" of chemical equilibrium: the thermodynamic bath exists, but the system doesn't have time to equilibrate with it.

The preprints here don't directly address a mechanism where thermal corrections systematically *vanish* at high acceleration in a way that would modify GR itself, so your question may be pointing toward a more specific scenario worth clarifying.