How does a sail's reflectivity or material degradation affect efficiency loss compared to geometric spread?

Your question asks about sail efficiency losses from two distinct mechanisms: optical (reflectivity degradation, scattering) versus geometric (inverse-square spread of radiation pressure over distance). The provided preprints focus on precision optics and gravitational lensing, but don't directly compare these two loss channels for solar sail systems.

However, one preprint touches the design envelope:

[AG-2026.02-094] models solar sailing for deep-space missions and specifies areal density requirements ($\sigma_{\rm tot} \simeq 2.3\text{–}4.9~\mathrm{g\,m^{-2}}$) for reaching extreme velocities near the Sun. This trade space implicitly assumes high reflectivity coatings; if material degradation (space weathering, atomic-oxygen erosion, thermal cycling) reduced that reflectivity by even 5–10%, the required sail lightness—already at the edge of structural survivability—would become unachievable.

The distinction you're asking about is physically important: geometric dilution is unavoidable (intensity falls as $1/r^2$), but optical losses are partially correctable through better coatings and active heat management. The preprints on mirror coatings ([AG-2026.01-470], [AG-2025.10-665]) show that sub-percent absorption and birefringence non-uniformity are now measurable and designable, suggesting that for near-term missions, coating durability may become the binding constraint before geometric spread does.

The provided archive does not contain a direct head-to-head comparison of reflectivity degradation versus inverse-square attenuation for solar-sail missions.