Does the 331 model's quark mixing arrangement determine whether B_s bounds are negligible or approach the 165 TeV scale?

Yes—quite dramatically. The quark mixing arrangement (specifically, how you assign the left-handed quark rotations $V_L^{u,d}$) is the decisive factor [AG-2025.03-1559].

The 331 model contains a new heavy neutral gauge boson, the $Z'$, that mediates flavor-changing neutral currents (FCNCs) at tree level [AG-2024.01-1102]. When this $Z'$ exchanges in meson oscillations, it generates constraints on its mass. But those constraints hinge entirely on *which* meson system dominates the physics—and that choice depends on the quark mixing parametrization.

Here's the stunning spread:

Scenario (i): If you choose $V_L^u = V_\text{CKM}^\dagger$, FCNCs are restricted to $D$-mesons, and the $D$–$\bar{D}$ oscillation data (which have large experimental uncertainty) loosens the bound to $M_{Z'} \gtrsim 600\,\text{GeV}$—a remarkably weak constraint [AG-2025.03-1559].

Scenario (ii): If instead you choose $V_L^d = V_\text{CKM}$, then $B_s$-meson oscillations dominate. The $B_s$ system is measured to exquisite precision, and the stringency of that data forces $M_{Z'} \gtrsim 165\,\text{TeV}$ [AG-2025.03-1559]—a difference of two orders of magnitude.

Why this matters: The 165 TeV bound would push the 331 model into severe tension with naturalness and unification scenarios, while the 600 GeV scenario remains viable for near-future collider searches. Which picture is correct hinges on how you rotate the quark fields into the mass eigenbasis, a choice that the literature has historically left ambiguous.

The paper also shows that the alignment limit of the Higgs sector (a key consistency requirement) is tightly constrained by $B_s$ data in scenario (ii), requiring $|\cos(\varphi+\phi)| < 0.01$ [AG-2025.03-1559].