Can thermodynamic shifts in stealth black holes explain why certain perturbation modes either stabilize or destabilize relative to GR?

Your question asks about thermodynamic shifts in stealth black holes driving perturbation mode stability/instability, but the archive materials don't directly address thermodynamics or stealth black holes. However, they do tackle a closely related core phenomenon: *why small changes to black hole spacetimes can flip the stability of perturbation modes between stable and unstable*.

Let me explain what the archive *does* illuminate about mode stabilization/destabilization.

The Spectrum's Hidden Fragility

The central finding across these papers is counterintuitive: the quasinormal modes (QNMs)—the characteristic "ringdown" oscillations a black hole emits after being perturbed—are *extraordinarily sensitive* to tiny alterations in the effective potential near the event horizon [AG-2026.04-1441]. Think of it like tuning a musical instrument where infinitesimal adjustments to string tension can shift a note from harmonic to discordant.

More strikingly, a stable black hole's QNM spectrum can become unstable under perturbations that would stabilize systems in flat spacetime [AG-2025.06-325]. This "butterfly effect in spacetime" suggests that horizon physics encodes an intrinsic sensitivity—the extreme spacetime curvature near the event horizon acts as an amplifier of perturbations.

Two Tools for Predicting Instability

The archive identifies two frameworks for *predicting* when modes destabilize:

1. Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) integrals: An infinite series of conserved quantities hidden in black hole dynamics. These emerge as reliable early-warning indicators of spectral instability in modified potentials [AG-2025.03-617, AG-2025.09-015]. The physical intuition: KdV integrals encode nonlinear wave structures, and their disruption signals when the potential's shape has crossed a threshold that dooms mode stability.

2. Pseudospectral sensitivity: By examining how resonances move in the complex plane when you vary perturbation strength or position, you can track trajectories toward "attracting points" that destabilize modes [AG-2026.01-178]. Weak perturbations near unperturbed resonances are influenced by repelling points, but sufficiently strong ones drive modes toward instability.

Environment Matters

Remarkably, whether modes stabilize or destabilize also depends on *where* perturbations sit. Matter near the light ring (innermost orbit where light can orbit) can destabilize fundamental modes of loosely-compact exotic objects, yet ultra-compact horizonless objects' fundamental modes remain robust—while *their overtones* develop instabilities [AG-2025.09-418]. This suggests a hierarchy: different mode families have different sensitivity thresholds.

What the Archive Doesn't Cover

The preprints focus on perturbations to the effective potential and environmental matter, not on thermodynamic mechanisms (temperature, entropy, heat flow) as drivers of stability change. "Stealth" black holes—those designed to evade certain detection signatures—also aren't discussed here. If thermodynamic phase transitions in stealth black holes are your specific concern, these papers won't directly answer it.