Why does interpolating through intermediate geometries work better than sampling random configurations?

This archive doesn't contain papers that directly address why interpolating through intermediate geometries outperforms random sampling—the preprints focus on random quantum circuits, quantum field theory state preparation, and geometric frustration, but not on interpolation methods for geometry optimization or sampling strategies.

However, I can offer some context: If your question concerns *variational quantum algorithms*, there's a relevant hint in [AG-2024.07-1770], which shows that VQE trainability improves dramatically when you use "close-to-solution initialization" and navigate a "regular cost function landscape" [AG-2024.07-1770]. The intuition is that interpolating through known good states (rather than sampling blindly) keeps you on a smoother path through the optimization landscape, avoiding barren plateaus—flat regions where gradients vanish.

For a more complete answer about interpolation *specifically* (whether in geometry, parameter space, or configuration space), you'd want papers on ansatz design, landscape geometry, or homotopy methods in quantum optimization.