What would distinguish this measurement-dependent repulsion from ordinary gravitational attraction in an actual experiment?

This is a fascinating question that cuts to the heart of what makes the measurement-dependent repulsion genuinely *quantum*.

The Core Distinction

The repulsion described in these papers [AG-2026.02-268, AG-2026.02-534] is fundamentally different from classical gravity because it requires quantum interference and postselection — two things that have no equivalent in Newtonian physics.

Here's the key: In classical gravity, a mass is a mass. Its gravitational field is determined by its location and mass-energy, period. But in the quantum proposals, you start by putting a source mass in a spatial superposition — it exists in two places at once. This creates two overlapping gravitational fields that can interfere with each other like light waves. When you then *measure* (postselect) the source mass in a specific location, you collapse that superposition. The "repulsion" that appears is actually the signature that you've destroyed a quantum state that was pulling in a different direction [AG-2026.02-268].

This uses what's called a weak value — a measurement outcome conditioned on a later measurement that reveals quantum correlations invisible to ordinary observation [AG-2026.02-534].

What an Experiment Would Actually Show

To distinguish this from classical attraction, you'd need to:

1. Prepare the source mass in superposition using atom interferometry or similar quantum control. The source must genuinely occupy two spatial states simultaneously before measurement.

2. Watch for the gravitational "pull" from both arms of the superposition. During the interaction, the probe mass would feel competing forces — one attractive from each position of the source [AG-2026.02-268].

3. Postselect on one outcome. Here's where the magic happens: condition your data only on measurements where the source mass is detected in (say) the left position. The probe mass, if you filter this way, statistically moves *away* from that position — repulsion [AG-2026.02-534].

4. Compare to a classical control. If the source mass were prepared in a classical mixture (50% chance left, 50% chance right, but not superposed), you'd never see repulsion no matter how you postselect. Repulsion only emerges from quantum superposition.

Why This Matters

Classical gravity is always attractive because a source mass at a definite location pulls everything toward it. Repulsion here proves that spacetime itself can be in superposition — two different gravitational geometries interfering like quantum waves [AG-2026.02-534]. It's evidence not just of quantum mechanics, but of quantized gravity.

The papers suggest this is experimentally feasible with spin-bearing nanocrystals [AG-2026.02-534], though the required masses, separations, and coherence times are exquisite.

None of the provided preprints directly address what would fail or what competing hypotheses would predict in such an experiment — they focus on the theoretical mechanism rather than experimental signatures that rule out alternatives.