Could NA62's sparse instrumentation regions still catch LUXE's high-energy tail events?

This is a fascinating question about detector geometry and complementarity, but the provided preprints don't directly address whether NA62's sparse instrumentation can catch LUXE's high-energy tail events.

Here's what we can piece together: NA62 operates as a beam-dump experiment with instrumented detection volumes beginning ~80 m downstream of the dump [AG-2025.02-1162], where it searches for feebly-interacting particles decaying in flight. LUXE, by contrast, is optimized for optical dump configurations studying strong-field QED and new physics in the 10–350 MeV mass range [AG-2025.07-1520].

The key issue your question raises—whether NA62's detector acceptance (which is optimized for its own geometry and physics targets) would have sufficient coverage to reliably detect high-energy tail events from LUXE-like processes—requires detailed Monte Carlo studies of angular distributions, energy thresholds, and dead zones that aren't analyzed in these papers. NA62's "minimalistic reconfiguration" for beam-dump mode [AG-2026.01-1312] suggests its layout is tuned for specific production mechanisms, which may or may not align with LUXE's event topology.

To answer this properly, you'd need comparative detector-acceptance studies or a dedicated feasibility note comparing the two experiments' geometric coverage for identical final states.