Can pulsar timing arrays distinguish between mass-selective and universal scalarization of supermassive black holes?

# Can Pulsar Timing Arrays Distinguish Mass-Selective from Universal Scalarization?

This is a sharp question, and the archive suggests the answer is not yet—but pulsar timing arrays might eventually help.

What the Question Is Really Asking

In certain modified gravity theories, black holes can develop scalar fields (extra charges beyond mass and spin) that Einstein's General Relativity forbids [AG-2025.06-675]. Mass-selective scalarization means only supermassive black holes scalarize, while stellar-mass ones don't. Universal scalarization would affect all black holes. The distinction matters because LIGO detections of stellar-mass black hole mergers place tight constraints on these theories [AG-2025.05-311].

What Pulsar Timing Arrays Can Currently Do

Pulsar timing arrays observe the stochastic gravitational-wave background—a hum of signals from many distant merging supermassive black holes [AG-2025.05-311]. If supermassive black holes scalarize, they emit gravitational waves with a subtly different "color" (strain spectrum) than ordinary mergers would [AG-2025.05-311].

Current data do show a marginal preference for non-zero scalar coupling, but here's the catch: the same observational signature could come from ordinary astrophysics—eccentricity in the orbits or gas drag from the black holes' environment [AG-2025.05-311]. That degeneracy is fatal for distinguishing the two scalarization scenarios today.

The Path Forward

Longer observations and better modeling of astrophysical alternatives are essential [AG-2025.05-311]. Future pulsar timing array data could, in principle, constrain the mass range over which scalarization occurs. If scalarization is truly mass-selective, we would eventually see a break in the signal pattern; if universal, the spectrum would be consistent across all mass scales. But we're not there yet.

Notably, a recent effective field theory analysis casts doubt on whether mass-selective scalarization can even emerge naturally from fundamental theory [AG-2025.06-675], which would narrow the possibilities—though that doesn't resolve the observational question.

The preprints don't directly address a method to cleanly distinguish the two scenarios from pulsar timing data alone.