How does the Gauss-Bonnet coupling strength need to vary with black hole mass to produce scalarization?

# Gauss-Bonnet Coupling and Black Hole Scalarization

The question touches on a subtle threshold effect in modified gravity. Here's what the archive shows:

The Mass-Dependent Window

Scalarization doesn't require a single universal coupling strength; instead, it depends critically on black hole mass. The key insight is that a coupling strength that triggers scalarization in supermassive black holes may leave stellar-mass black holes stable [AG-2025.05-311]. This happens because the relevant length scale λ in the coupling sets a threshold below which deviations from General Relativity become significant—and this threshold interacts with black hole size in a non-trivial way.

More concretely: for supermassive black holes to scalarize while LIGO/Virgo sources (typically 10–100 solar masses) remain unaffected, the coupling must be tuned to a narrow window [AG-2025.05-311]. This is *not* a free parameter—it's a constrained scenario, because integrating out heavy fields in effective field theory doesn't naturally produce mass-selective scalarization [AG-2025.06-675].

Nonlinear vs. Linear Regimes

The coupling's role differs depending on the mechanism:

• Curvature-induced scalarization (linear instability): Here, even very rapidly rotating black holes can develop significant scalar charge for "certain coupling parameters" [AG-2025.03-712], suggesting the coupling strength sets the *magnitude* of the effect rather than a sharp threshold.

• Nonlinear scalarization: The coupling function's form matters enormously. Polynomial couplings with $ζ''(0) = 0$ (like $\zeta(\phi) = \alpha\phi^4 - \beta\phi^8$) can trigger nonlinear instabilities and scalarized branches, whereas $\zeta(\phi) = \alpha\phi^4$ alone does not [AG-2024.04-568]. The additional squared Gauss-Bonnet term and coupling strength together "significantly influence the existence and properties of these solutions" [AG-2025.09-463].

Physical Boundary: Effective Field Theory Validity

There's a hard constraint: below a critical black hole mass, the perturbation equations lose hyperbolicity, signaling a breakdown of the effective field theory itself [AG-2026.04-239]. With careful choice of coupling function, this minimum mass can be made arbitrarily small—but observable deviations from GR (like scalar charge) remain bounded above [AG-2026.04-239], so you can't simply dial up arbitrarily large effects.

Bottom line: The coupling strength doesn't vary *with* mass in a simple prescribed way; rather, for a *fixed* coupling strength, scalarization is triggered or suppressed depending on mass, black hole spin, and the specific functional form of the coupling—making mass-selective scalarization a delicate, narrowly-constrained scenario.