How do galaxy orbital timescales in clusters compare to the timescales assumed in modified gravity field equations?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Galaxy Orbital Timescales vs. Modified Gravity Field Equations Your question touches on a crucial tension: galaxy clusters move on dynamical timescales set by their orbital mechanics, but modified gravity theories often assume field equations calibrated to different regimes. Let me unpack what the archive shows. The Timescale Mismatch Galaxy clusters have orbital periods of billions of years — a galaxy crossing a cluster takes roughly a dynamical time $t {m dyn} \sim \sqrt{Gho^{ 1}}$, which for cluster densities is order Gigayears. This is directly observable through proper motions [AG 2025.04 1338] and stellar kinematics [AG 2024.11 181]. However, modified gravity field equations are typically constructed to match galactic dynamics, which operate on much shorter timescales (hundreds of Megayears for disk stars). Where the Theories Break Down The core problem is that theories like AQUAL and GRAS were designed to fit galactic rotation curves through a characteristic acceleration threshold ($a 0 \approx 1.2 	imes 10^{ 10}$ m/s² for MOND [AG 2024.10 033]). When these same equations are naively applied to galaxy clusters, they fail catastrophically — they cannot account for the observed velocity dispersions and the "missing mass" in cluster dynamics [AG 2026.02 201]. Why? Clusters operate in a fundamentally different gravitational regime. Individual galaxies within a cluster feel accelerations below that MOND threshold, yet the cluster as a whole is gravitationally bound. The timescale problem is really a scale problem : a field equation fitted to one regime (galactic, kpc, Megayear orbital periods) doesn't smoothly extend to another (cluster, Megaparsec, Gigayear orbital periods). Attempts to Reconcile Recent work has tried to develop unified field equations. One approach modifies GRAS/AQUAL with a single additional parameter that works across both galactic and cluster scales [AG 2026.02 201]. The idea is to introduce gravitational self energy corrections that become important only at cluster scales, where the cumulative effect of many galaxies matters. This is distinct from dark matter but requires the field equation itself to be nonlinear in a new way. Another strategy invokes a Yukawa type correction to gravity [AG 2024.04 033], which can recover MOND at galactic scales while introducing a length scale $\lambda$ on the order of kiloparsecs. However, when you try to match cosmological observations, this parameter comes into wild contradiction with galactic measurements — a sign that no single modified gravity law yet bridgesall scales smoothly. What the Observations Say Merger timescales in simulations vary significantly with host halo mass [AG 2025.04 063], meaning that even within clusters, the dynamical timescale is not universal. This adds another layer: a field equation must not only work across scale ranges, but must also naturally produce timescale variations that depend on environment in the way nature does. Bottom line: The provided preprints show that standard modified gravity field equations calibrated to galaxies do not naturally reproduce cluster dynamics on cluster timescales, and current attempts to extend them face tensions between galactic and cosmological data.