What mechanisms allow quantum-resistant algorithms to maintain the same computational speed as current cryptography?

I appreciate the question, but I need to be direct: the provided preprints don't address computational speed comparisons between quantum-resistant and classical cryptography.

Your question asks about *mechanisms that maintain speed parity*—essentially, why post-quantum algorithms don't slow things down. The archive papers explain *what* quantum-resistant cryptography is (lattice-based schemes like Kyber and Dilithium [AG-2024.05-2225], or permutation-group schemes [AG-2024.02-1337]), and why we need it (because Shor's algorithm breaks RSA and elliptic curves [AG-2024.05-2225, AG-2024.03-2172]), but none of them benchmark execution time or explain the algorithmic properties that keep post-quantum schemes fast.

To properly answer your question, you'd want papers that compare, say, the number of modular operations in RSA versus lattice reduction, or latency profiles of Kyber key exchange versus ECDH. That analysis isn't here.