If squeezed light degrades over LISA's longer storage times, does quantum advantage collapse faster than at LIGO frequencies?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Your question asks whether squeezed light quantum advantage degrades faster at LISA's lower frequencies compared to LIGO. The archive doesn't directly compare degradation timescales across detector frequency bands, but I can clarify what we know about the physics. The core issue: optical loss, not frequency Squeezed light advantage degrades primarily through optical losses—imperfect mirrors, absorption, and scattering—that destroy the quantum correlations [AG 2025.06 216]. These losses accumulate as photons travel through the interferometer's optics, independent of the gravitational wave signal frequency itself. LIGO achieves broadband squeezing 3 dB below the standard quantum limit despite these losses [AG 2024.04 408], showing that optical quality engineering, not frequency, is the limiting factor. Why LISA might face different challenges LISA operates at millihertz frequencies and uses a 2.5 million km arm length. If squeezed states were injected at LISA, they would need to survive longer propagation times through the arm cavities. However, the preprints focus on filter cavity designs for rotating the squeezing ellipse across detector bandwidth [AG 2025.06 216, AG 2024.04 2117]. LISA's geometry and frequency band are fundamentally different from ground based detectors, and none of these papers address LISA specific squeezing schemes directly. The practical bottleneck For future ground based detectors like Einstein Telescope, multiple or coupled filter cavities may be needed, and resilience to optical losses becomes the dominant concern [AG 2025.06 216]—not the signal frequency. The same principle would apply to space based detectors. The provided preprints don't contain a direct comparison of squeezing degradation timescales at LIGO versus LISA frequencies.