Could modified gravity theories that fit rotation curves also explain cosmic microwave background anisotropies?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Modified Gravity and the CMB: A Narrower Bridge Than You'd Hope The short answer: the preprints show that several modified gravity theories can fit galaxy rotation curves well, but they largely remain silent on whether those same modifications also explain the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. This is a critical gap. Why This Matters Galaxy rotation curves and CMB anisotropies probe gravity at very different scales and epochs. A complete theory of modified gravity must pass both tests—not just one. If a modification explains flat rotation curves but worsens agreement with CMB data, it's incomplete as a fundamental theory. What the Archive Shows On rotation curves: Multiple modified gravity approaches do succeed locally. The hyperconical modified gravity (HMG) model fits 123 rotation curves well [AG 2024.10 139], and the Weyl tensor coupling approach reproduces realistic galactic kinematics across seven nearby galaxies [AG 2026.04 061]. Thermal gravity and many body gravity also claim fair matches to the Milky Way and Andromeda [AG 2024.03 289]. On CMB anisotropies: There is one theoretical proposal—a modified Compton scattering model incorporating Loop Quantum Gravity that introduces new parameters to fit Planck 2018 CMB data [AG 2024.07 004]. However, this paper does not claim to derive from any of the rotation curve fitting theories above, nor does it address whether those theories are consistent with its CMB mechanism. The critical missing link: None of the rotation curve studies systematically check whether their modified metric or field equations remain compatible with large scale structure formation and the observed CMB power spectrum. Conversely, the CMB focused preprint does not test its model against rotation curves. One Cautionary Note A study of Chern Simons modified gravity found that while it predicts an extra term in particle velocities, perturbative approaches "cannot physically explain the flattening of galactic rotation curves" [AG 2024.07 400]—a reminder that modifying gravity is much easier than satisfying all constraints simultaneously. The preprints do not directly address whether any single modified gravity theory consistent with rotation curves also explains CMB anisotropies.