Could you test surrogate robustness by intentionally corrupting training data with geometric noise before fitting?

Your question asks about a machine learning technique—deliberately adding noise to training data to test model robustness—in the context of surrogate models (approximate stand-ins for expensive computations). This is a reasonable ML practice, but the preprints you've been provided focus on quantum machine learning and quantum error mitigation, not classical surrogate robustness testing.

The closest relevant work is [AG-2024.07-2163], which describes VeriQR, a tool that "mimics real-world quantum hardware's noisy impacts by incorporating random noise to formally validate a QML model's robustness." This does test robustness by injecting noise, but into quantum circuits rather than classical surrogate training data. Similarly, [AG-2024.04-2204] constructs "optimal noise channels" to enhance adversarial robustness in QML by adding structured noise during training—a cognate idea to your question, but again in the quantum domain.

For classical surrogate robustness via geometric noise corruption, the provided archive doesn't contain directly applicable guidance.