What classical preprocessing time would offset the quantum speedup if measurements require frequent recompilation?

Your question touches on a real tension in quantum computing: if you need to recompile the circuit after each measurement (rather than use pre-planned measurement-controlled gates), how much classical overhead negates the quantum speedup?

The provided preprints don't directly address this trade-off — none quantifies the classical recompilation cost you're asking about. However, they do illuminate the related problem from several angles.

The measurement problem itself: Mid-circuit measurements are expensive. One approach to reduce this cost is probabilistic substitution: [AG-2024.05-2315] describes an algorithm that replaces some mid-circuit measurements with randomized gate applications, precomputing measurement probabilities classically. This avoids the hardware cost of measurement and feedback, but it trades one form of classical work for another. The key insight is that classical preprocessing (constant propagation) can run in polynomial time on the number of qubits and gates — so if your quantum speedup is exponential, polynomial preprocessing overhead won't dominate.

The broader coupling problem: Quantum computers don't run in isolation. When you need frequent recompilation, you're coupling a quantum processor tightly to classical hardware. [AG-2024.04-1962] and [AG-2024.03-1368] both grapple with this: the latter shows that classical precomputation of intermediate results (using cryogenic SFQ circuits) can reduce inter-system communication by 97%, and [AG-2024.06-2282] frames decoder scheduling as a bottleneck that can waste 10–40% of classical resources if mismanaged. Recompilation sits in this same systems category — it's a synchronization cost.

The fundamental speed limit: [AG-2024.05-2401] establishes a universal speed-accuracy trade-off for quantum measurements: non-commuting observables cannot be measured to zero error in finite time. This doesn't directly answer your question, but it suggests that reducing measurement errors (and thus the need to recompile due to measurement failures) has an energetic cost that scales with measurement speed.

Bottom line: Your question — whether classical recompilation time offsets quantum speedup — requires a concrete analysis of a specific algorithm and hardware platform, quantifying both the quantum speedup and the classical recompilation cost per measurement cycle. None of these preprints does that calculation.