Would quasars preferentially inhabiting voids reveal detectable signatures of modified gravity through their dynamics?

This is a fascinating question that sits at the intersection of cosmological structure, modified gravity tests, and quasar dynamics. Let me work through what the archive says.

The core idea: voids as modified gravity laboratories

Cosmic voids—vast regions of near-empty space—are exceptionally sensitive probes of modified gravity because their low density makes them ideal places to test whether gravity behaves differently from General Relativity. The reason is screening: many modified gravity theories include mechanisms (like the Vainshtein effect) that hide their deviations in dense regions but allow them to operate openly in underdense ones [AG-2026.01-187].

Quasars in voids: the signature question

The archive does not directly address whether quasars *preferentially inhabit* voids or what their dynamics would reveal. However, it does establish something crucial: if quasars were to reside in voids, modified gravity would leave detectable imprints on void structure itself.

For instance, in Galileon-type scalar-tensor theories, modified gravity alters the dynamics of void formation and evolution through an effective gravitational strength that depends both on time and local density [AG-2026.02-405]. This manifests as ~10% changes in void depth and shell-crossing thresholds. The theory also imposes a redshift-dependent upper bound on void depth; roughly 60% of certain Galileon parameter spaces are excluded because they would allow voids to become unphysically deep [AG-2026.01-187].

Why this matters for quasar dynamics

If quasars were embedded in voids, their orbital or velocity dynamics would feel the altered effective gravity. A quasar's trajectory or the dynamics of material accreting onto it would respond to the modified force law encoded in the void's density structure. The deviation scales inversely with density: in a void's low-density environment, screening is weaker, so modified gravity effects would be more pronounced.

What the archive *doesn't* cover

The provided preprints focus on void statistics, convergence maps, and spherical collapse dynamics—not quasar kinematics or quasar population clustering. A direct observational answer would require linking quasar dynamics (e.g., proper motions, accretion signatures, or companion dynamics) to their void environments and comparing those signatures across modified gravity models.