How would temporal singularities leave any observable signature if they're fundamentally undetectable?

You've identified a genuine tension that cuts to the heart of observational cosmology and relativistic physics.

The short answer: temporal singularities *can* leave observable signatures, but only if they affect the causal structure in ways that reach us—and whether they do that at all is deeply constrained by what we can measure.

The Indistinguishability Problem

The core issue is observational indistinguishability. [AG-2026.03-104] shows that in almost all classical spacetimes, observers cannot collect enough data to determine whether the conditions for singularity theorems are satisfied. More strikingly: "all past singular dust FLRW spacetimes have observationally indistinguishable counterparts which...either do not include a singularity to the past of every point or else do not have the sort [required]." This means a universe with a temporal singularity at its beginning can produce identical observations to one without—a blow to the idea that singularities are experimentally distinguishable in principle.

When Singularities *Do* Leave Traces

But singularities can announce themselves if they alter the geometry in detectable ways. [AG-2026.03-481] demonstrates this for *spatial* singularities in horizonless objects: the causal character (timelike vs. null vs. spacelike) of a singularity directly affects photon sphere geometry and strong-field lensing patterns—signatures potentially measurable by the Event Horizon Telescope. The link is causal geometry: a timelike singularity allows light rays to escape in ways a spacelike one forbids, producing different shadows.

More recent work [AG-2025.05-629] shows that singular vs. regular black holes differ in the number of light rings (two vs. one), and may produce distinct echo signals in gravitational wave observations—again, a signature rooted in how the singularity's causal structure traps or releases light.

The Observer-Dependency

Crucially, visibility depends on *your* location. [AG-2025.08-394] proves that whether a singularity is visible to external observers hinges on the dynamics of apparent horizons during collapse. If a trapped surface forms before the singularity, it hides; if the singularity forms first, it may be naked. The timing is everything—and observers outside the horizon may see very different signals than those inside.

At the quantum level, [AG-2024.07-417] notes that singularities with scalar curvature can be avoided entirely in quantum-gravity-corrected models, changing the whole observational picture.

The Deeper Issue

Your question reveals why physicists find singularities philosophically unsatisfying: a truly *undetectable* singularity is arguably unphysical—it's merely a failure of the theory, not a feature of nature. The papers here suggest that temporal singularities leave signatures *when and only when* they affect the causal structure in ways that propagate to us. If they're genuinely causally isolated (a true temporal firewall), they're indeed unobservable and may not be real physics at all.