How do scale-dependent primordial modifications fail BAO and SNIa constraints where infrared mechanisms succeed?

# Scale-Dependent Primordial Modifications vs. Infrared Mechanisms in the Hubble Tension

The key distinction lies in *where* the modification sits in the cosmic timeline and how rigorously it satisfies late-time data.

Why Scale-Dependent Primordial Modifications Fail BAO and SNIa

Scale-dependent modifications to the primordial power spectrum—changes to the spectrum of density fluctuations seeded by inflation—can resolve the tension between Planck CMB and SH0ES measurements of the Hubble constant [AG-2025.04-168]. The mechanism works by adjusting how much matter was present at early times, inferred from the CMB's acoustic peak structure.

However, these solutions carry a fatal constraint: they require a low total matter density ($\Omega_m$) to fit the CMB data while also reducing the Hubble tension [AG-2025.04-168]. When you force-fit low-$\Omega_m$ cosmologies to Planck, the *same low matter density* then predicts the wrong expansion history at late times. Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO)—a "standard ruler" imprinted at recombination and stretched by the universe's expansion—and supernovae (SNIa) distances are exquisitely sensitive to $\Omega_m$ [AG-2025.04-168, AG-2024.05-207]. A cosmology that works for Planck thus overfits the CMB while degrading agreement with BAO and SNIa, rather than genuinely solving the tension [AG-2025.04-168].

In short: primordial modifications are *directly constrained* by matter density, trapping them in an internally inconsistent corner of parameter space.

Why Infrared (Scale-Dependent Gravity) Mechanisms Succeed

By contrast, infrared modifications—where the gravitational constant $G$ and cosmological constant $\Lambda$ acquire scale-dependent corrections at the perturbative level, motivated by renormalization group effects in quantum gravity—preserve the General Relativity background equations [AG-2024.11-359]. This is crucial.

Because the background metric and expansion history remain untouched, infrared gravity modifications do *not* force a peculiar matter density to fit the CMB. They instead modify only how perturbations (density ripples) respond to gravity at different scales [AG-2024.11-359]. When tested against CMB, BAO, SNIa, and redshift-space distortions simultaneously, infrared models remain consistent with $\Lambda$CDM predictions and produce only modest parameter uncertainties, without exacerbating existing tensions [AG-2024.11-359].

The asymmetry is stark: primordial models must sacrifice late-time data to improve CMB fits; infrared models accommodate both because they decouple the early-universe physics from the background expansion history.

---

*The provided preprints do not discuss why infrared mechanisms are *physically* favored (e.g., UV-completeness arguments or string-theory motivation) beyond the renormalization-group motivation in [AG-2024.11-359].*