Could vorticity re-emerge if you relax the scalar potential smoothness requirement slightly?

This is a sharp technical question about whether vorticity can emerge from relaxing assumptions about scalar potential fields. Let me work through what the archive says.

The short answer: yes, vorticity does re-emerge when you relax irrotationality assumptions, and it can appear even in scalar field frameworks if you allow more realistic physical structure.

Here's the key evidence:

Vorticity from layered flow with non-uniform smoothness:

The most direct answer comes from a two-layer model. When you abandon the assumption that the entire flow is irrotational, vorticity naturally appears in the lower layer via shear [AG-2024.09-427]. The upper layer remains vorticity-free, but the lower layer has *constant* vorticity. This is precisely a relaxation of the global "smooth scalar potential" requirement—you're allowing a discontinuity or sharp transition in the potential's smoothness at the layer boundary. The result is concrete: the system now supports *three* elementary excitations instead of two, with the extra one being vortical in character.

Vorticity embedded in quantum-fluid analogues:

There's a complementary picture from the Euler-Korteweg model [AG-2025.06-941]. Although this work primarily studies *irrotational* vortices in the classical sense, it reveals that when you introduce geometric structure (topology, curvature) or relax certain idealizations, vortex clusters develop collective dynamics and confinement effects not present in the smooth-potential limit. This suggests that real (non-smooth) boundary or internal structure lets vorticity organize itself.

Vorticity suppresses instabilities when present:

An important secondary result: when vorticity is already present in a rotating fluid, it *diminishes* the ergoregion instability that plagues smooth irrotational flows [AG-2024.10-601]. This shows vorticity is not just a perturbative reappearance—it qualitatively changes the dynamics.

Why this matters: In irrotational flows, all motion is governed by a single scalar potential (velocity is the gradient of that potential). The instant you allow the potential to be non-smooth—via boundaries, layers, or internal discontinuities—the curl of velocity (vorticity) becomes non-zero, and you get richer physics with more degrees of freedom.

The provided preprints don't directly address a general variational principle for when smooth-potential assumptions fail, so I can't speak to the precise mathematical conditions under which relaxation triggers re-emergence.