Why do decentralized systems need full node consensus for upgrades, but traditional banks can patch centrally?

I appreciate the question, but these preprints don't address your actual query. You're asking about governance and consensus mechanisms in decentralized systems versus traditional institutions — a question rooted in organizational design and incentive theory, not physics or quantum computing.

The archive here focuses on frontier physics (quantum computing, cryptography, propulsion, relativity). For a thoughtful answer to your question, you'd want papers on blockchain governance, distributed systems consensus protocols, or institutional economics — fields outside this collection.

If you're curious about *quantum threats* to blockchain security, or how quantum networks might enable new forms of distributed trust, I'd be glad to help with those angles instead.