How does the sign flip of many-body dispersion corrections change crack surface adhesion across different geometries?

# Many-Body Dispersion Sign Flips and Crack Surface Adhesion

Your question sits at an intersection the archive touches, but doesn't directly address. Let me explain what we know about the mechanism, then the gap.

How Many-Body Corrections Change Sign

The sign of many-body dispersion (MBD) corrections—whether they add attractive or repulsive character to van der Waals interactions—depends fundamentally on quantum entanglement in the system. [AG-2024.07-1701] shows that entanglement monogamy in assemblies of quantum oscillators determines this sign: attractive corrections dominate in some geometries, repulsive in others, and they can even cancel to zero. This matters because it means dispersion forces aren't simply pair-wise additive; a third or fourth atom fundamentally changes whether the second and third atoms pull toward or push away from each other.

The same principle appears in disparate settings. For Casimir forces between magneto-electric materials, the sign flips depending on symmetry breaking and material properties [AG-2024.03-1386]. On corrugated surfaces, realistic material dispersion (absorption and frequency-dependent permittivity) amplifies whether particles sit in valleys or peaks of a corrugation [AG-2024.02-1558]. Even on 2D materials like suspended graphene, many-body effects coupled to atomic thinness can produce stark repulsive forces—1.4 kN/m² at short range [AG-2024.06-1764]—that dominate over simple pair interactions.

Application to Crack Surfaces: The Gap

The archive does not directly study how these MBD sign flips affect crack surface adhesion across geometries. [AG-2024.04-1576] demonstrates a DFTB+MBD framework for mechanics of materials and shows that quantum van der Waals corrections modify mechanical properties, but doesn't focus on fracture mechanics or adhesion at crack tips. The conceptual bridge is clear—a sign flip in dispersion at a crack surface would shift the balance between adhesive bonding and surface separation—yet no preprint here models that explicitly.

To answer your specific question, you'd need work combining fracture mechanics, realistic surface geometry (roughness, contamination, defects), and MBD theory as a coupled problem.